• #DonaldTrump Confirms #ICE Enforcement Proceedings Underway Against #IlhanOmar Over #Immigration Fraud https://michaelsavage.com/bombshell-trump-confirms-ice-enforcement-proceedings-underway-against-ilhan-omar-over-immigration-fraud/
    #DonaldTrump Confirms #ICE Enforcement Proceedings Underway Against #IlhanOmar Over #Immigration Fraud https://michaelsavage.com/bombshell-trump-confirms-ice-enforcement-proceedings-underway-against-ilhan-omar-over-immigration-fraud/
    Wow
    1
    0 Commenti 0 Condivisioni 2K Visualizzazioni
  • SCOTUS: States' Rights vs. Immigration Chaos!
    https://www.youtube.com/live/3BlAMmhuYko?si=NVYRr3i9L2kS6bbs
    Can a state actually help enforce federal immigration law—or does the Constitution force states to sit on their hands while illegal immigration overruns their communities? That's the question at the heart of a major cert petition now before the Supreme Court, and Senators Ted Cruz and Chuck Grassley just filed a blistering amicus brief taking direct aim at the Eighth Circuit's decision to strike down Iowa's immigration law. Today we break it all down, plain-English style. The brief argues the real culprit is the Supreme Court's own 2012 decision in Arizona v. United States—a ruling so poorly reasoned it turned "conflict preemption" into a one-way ratchet: states that try to help Washington enforce the law get shut down, while sanctuary states that openly obstruct federal enforcement get a pass. Cruz and Grassley say it's time for the Court to fix its own mess before more states lose the ability to defend their citizens from an immigration crisis the Founders never envisioned tolerating.
    SCOTUS: States' Rights vs. Immigration Chaos! https://www.youtube.com/live/3BlAMmhuYko?si=NVYRr3i9L2kS6bbs Can a state actually help enforce federal immigration law—or does the Constitution force states to sit on their hands while illegal immigration overruns their communities? That's the question at the heart of a major cert petition now before the Supreme Court, and Senators Ted Cruz and Chuck Grassley just filed a blistering amicus brief taking direct aim at the Eighth Circuit's decision to strike down Iowa's immigration law. Today we break it all down, plain-English style. The brief argues the real culprit is the Supreme Court's own 2012 decision in Arizona v. United States—a ruling so poorly reasoned it turned "conflict preemption" into a one-way ratchet: states that try to help Washington enforce the law get shut down, while sanctuary states that openly obstruct federal enforcement get a pass. Cruz and Grassley say it's time for the Court to fix its own mess before more states lose the ability to defend their citizens from an immigration crisis the Founders never envisioned tolerating.
    - YouTube
    Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
    0 Commenti 0 Condivisioni 4K Visualizzazioni
  • ### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ ·
    President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs.
    Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch.
    An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences.
    President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..
    ### First Signal o͏o͏e͏p͏d͏s͏S͏t͏r͏n͏ ͏ ͏t͏5͏0͏8͏1͏i͏a͏h͏i͏3͏ ͏t͏4͏c͏0͏9͏8͏t͏4͏A͏a͏4͏4͏t͏c͏6͏1͏t͏t͏2͏ ͏i͏i͏s͏g͏4͏c͏:͏0͏0͏1͏c͏A͏M͏2͏c͏u͏u͏ · President Trump fired six more immigration judges this week, and the reason is straightforward: these judges were not doing their jobs. Instead of applying federal immigration law as written, they were using their courtrooms to block deportations and undermine the enforcement policies of the executive branch. An immigration judge is not a policymaker. They do not have the authority to simply decide they disagree with immigration law and refuse to enforce it. That is not a judicial function. That is a political act. And when a federal employee uses a government position to pursue a political agenda against the stated policies of the administration they serve, they should expect consequences. President Trump ran on border security. He won. The American people gave him a mandate to enforce immigration law fully. That mandate cannot be nullified by unelected judges who disagree with it..
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 Condivisioni 4K Visualizzazioni